According to laws written historically by men, people cannot sue for damages or against laws BEFORE we are damaged. Women/those capable of pregnancy cannot sue against these laws unless actively seeking to protect themselves against them. For instance, when Texas women sued against the bans harming them, Texas argued they were no longer pregnant. Then Kate Cox was having a harmful pregnancy and she was blocked by Paxton & the Texas courts. It’s ridiculous. Parents have sued against birth control being handed potentially to their daughters when they were able to receive birth control, and won. I don’t know why lawyers don’t challenge these laws and point to these obvious exceptions. There are other examples- such as the “website designer” who didn’t want to make any sites for same sex partners. It’s always these conservative, reactionary people who are able to get their potential “damage” heard in courts.
The website designer had never even created a website, and the man she claimed wanted her to do their website, was a straight man, long married and a real website designer. She was a contrived victim, who lied her ass off. funded by the ADF of course.
Women were physically harmed. Several lost their ability to have children even though they managed to survive. If women passed laws saying that going forward, men will not be treated for testicular cancer, and deaths occurred as a result, do you think it would be tolerated? I don’t.
Our laws are being perverted by psychopaths, including the Opus Dei Supreme Court and we’re tolerating it. We’re no better than Iran in our treatment of women and at this point, we might be worse.
I know there are women lawyers out there. We need to go on the offensive.
Jessica, please can you brand and sell t-shirts, sweatshirts etc that just simply set “fuck off and enjoy your life”?
It’s such a fucking game to them. They are trying to exhaust us. I’d like to put my exhaustion into a donation toward supporting you AND supporting those who have the galvanizing energy to keep taking them on. We need people who can do this! If you make I’ll buy!
Like the riverboats where you can gamble, they have an offshore barge that distributes pills that are manufactured from somewhere overseas as well (forget where).
Free resource to help communicate securely - online or offline. Use it anonymously without registering or installing an app.
Encrypt your messages *before* you send them. You can even encrypt a message on your phone or laptop - when it is disconnected from the internet.
https://thedemlabs.org/2024/12/15/spycraft-basics-communicate-securely/
https://thedemlabs.org/2024/12/14/communicate-securely-online-or-offline-with-makeitprivate/
These psychopaths are murdering women. How do we start a lawsuit that takes them down for premeditated murder?
According to laws written historically by men, people cannot sue for damages or against laws BEFORE we are damaged. Women/those capable of pregnancy cannot sue against these laws unless actively seeking to protect themselves against them. For instance, when Texas women sued against the bans harming them, Texas argued they were no longer pregnant. Then Kate Cox was having a harmful pregnancy and she was blocked by Paxton & the Texas courts. It’s ridiculous. Parents have sued against birth control being handed potentially to their daughters when they were able to receive birth control, and won. I don’t know why lawyers don’t challenge these laws and point to these obvious exceptions. There are other examples- such as the “website designer” who didn’t want to make any sites for same sex partners. It’s always these conservative, reactionary people who are able to get their potential “damage” heard in courts.
The website designer had never even created a website, and the man she claimed wanted her to do their website, was a straight man, long married and a real website designer. She was a contrived victim, who lied her ass off. funded by the ADF of course.
Women were physically harmed. Several lost their ability to have children even though they managed to survive. If women passed laws saying that going forward, men will not be treated for testicular cancer, and deaths occurred as a result, do you think it would be tolerated? I don’t.
Our laws are being perverted by psychopaths, including the Opus Dei Supreme Court and we’re tolerating it. We’re no better than Iran in our treatment of women and at this point, we might be worse.
I know there are women lawyers out there. We need to go on the offensive.
Jessica, please can you brand and sell t-shirts, sweatshirts etc that just simply set “fuck off and enjoy your life”?
It’s such a fucking game to them. They are trying to exhaust us. I’d like to put my exhaustion into a donation toward supporting you AND supporting those who have the galvanizing energy to keep taking them on. We need people who can do this! If you make I’ll buy!
Like the riverboats where you can gamble, they have an offshore barge that distributes pills that are manufactured from somewhere overseas as well (forget where).