73 Comments
author
Aug 1, 2023·edited Aug 1, 2023Author

There is a lot of cool discussion around this piece, thank you for engaging with it so deeply. I thought I'd send over an extra word of encouragement to look into the hyperlinks from Naomi and Sonia throughout the article. This piece especially has great further reading that goes deeper into its history and politics. I think you'll enjoy it. Thank you!

Expand full comment

This article was so scary I couldn’t finish it.

Expand full comment

Thanks so much 👍

Expand full comment

And I’m sure “they” will find a way of exempting Viagra…..

Expand full comment

This is a ray of sunshine!!! Geez!!

Thanks Grace and Jessica for all your hard work and reporting and explaining this. Well, my first thought was CRAP! Second thought was solution based. Keep Calm and Carry On. The law doesn't say anything about delivering it by hand but alas one has to get the pills first. I envision these pills going underground (black market) if it does happen or on the Dark Web. Safety issues arise of course.

If the Comstock Act does get fully enforced it will impact a variety of products and have a huge effect on the economy. Will Viagra be included in this? That's all I got pausing to absorb...sigh and mentally prepare.

Expand full comment

Hi Jessica. Cut it out! Another collum that really pissed me off.

Actually,

I think you're not being pessimistic enough.

Let's say we win the Comstock battle.

Yea!

But wait. The Federalist Society has been planning and working against abortion for 4 decades. This is far from their only tactic. Look at thalidomide- surely we can't trust the FDA. Why don't we try the tactic that worked with cannabis- it needs to be banned for the good of the public. The supreme court isn't becoming marginally any better either. We need to ban affirmative admissions. Screw the minority's. So what if legacy admissions increase. Who will many of the legacies be? Probably people from the likes of Hillsdale and the Christian home schools .

As Liz Chaney said recently- we're electing Morons.

Sorry, I needed to vent.

In parting, a joke I made up yesterday. Grammatically bad, I know.

Why don't proctologists and goats get along? They both butt heads.

Expand full comment
founding

I’m not ready to accept that.

Expand full comment

As always, I appreciate this thorough explanation of a preposterous law.

Expand full comment

Never Take Your Eye Off The Ball. I grew up in Colorado a long time ago and had the good fortune to be represented by Patricia Schroeder- a forward looking woman if there ever was one. SHE tried to start the conversation to repeal the Comstock Act for just the reason so clearly presented here. She didn't get much traction because nobody thought we would devolve as far as we have. This is going to be a nightmare that could have been avoided. I am sick every day when I read what is happening to women in this country. Thank you for your work but I am very pessimistic that this is going to improve. I am pretty sure access for reproductive care is going to become even more limiting and punishment of pregnant women and health care providers will accelerate in much of this country.

Expand full comment

Thank you, once again, for invaluably clear and thorough reporting.

It sounds like abortion rights supporters, and anyone counting on their OB-GYN to have the appropriate tools and medications to treat their reproductive health, need to start a “Repeal Comstock” drive ASAP. Like, yesterday.

Expand full comment

Wouldn’t mail-order Viagra and its generics, as offered by companies such as Roman, also be covered under the Comstock Act?

Expand full comment

My first thought. The good ol’ boys would not care for that.

Expand full comment

Their starting point for reasoning is that their reproductive organs are a divine gift from their big penis god in the sky, while ours are portals to evil in need of punishment and control. I can't imagine they would think there could be anything sinful or smutty about Viagra.

Expand full comment

Yikes well said!!

Expand full comment
founding

Why do I never hear any discussion re: the separation of Church and State? Why are these religious nuts getting away with murder? Where are the Constitutional lawyers?

Expand full comment

The far right has been very careful to pretend that this has nothing to do with religion. It’s all about the fact that by having different DNA from the person carrying it, a fetus is a separate person who has the intrinsic right to life - because killing another human being is murder.

Yes, we all know this is bullshit, but it’s enough to pass muster in our biased courts.

Expand full comment

Although killing another human being is perfectly legal under a number of circumstances. Abortion rights can be consistently viewed as a Castle Doctrine for the womb.

Expand full comment

If fetuses are people, women are their chattel. That's what this argument is saying. Fetuses have special privileges to other people's bodies that literally no one else has. It violates the 5th, 13th and 14th amendments. I know I keep posting this article but it's so important.

State Abortion Bans: Pregnancy as a New Form of Coverture

https://virginialawreview.org/articles/state-abortion-bans-pregnancy-as-a-new-form-of-coverture/

Expand full comment

Thank you for the citation. This is a brilliant article - so clear and plain-speaking.

Expand full comment

I am currently reading “The Woman They Could Not Silence” by Kate Moore. The concept of coverture with regard to marital coverture is very well described and explained in this book in a way that I think makes it quite understandable (and infuriating). It is also terrifyingly clear to draw the connection between the lack of rights of women in the 1860s and now. And the ideas promoted by Comstock, a contemporary of this time in history (mid 19th century), seriously make me ill. The fact that his laws are being championed…ugh.

Expand full comment

That’s one of my favorite pieces on the issue.

The problem is that the average voter doesn’t understand coverture as a concept to start with. I shared it elsewhere and asked lawyer friends to weigh in on how this could be used to our advantage, but didn’t get much response.

I think we need to have a few smart, creative lawyers to look into this.

Expand full comment

Surprised to but see any in the comments since I've been here. Zach and I were hoping Grace or Jessica would ask the ones in the article about it.

Expand full comment
founding

Hope Jessica and Grace have time to follow up with their sources on this 🤞

Expand full comment

Guess we could try emailing them again. Have you heard back from the last time?

Expand full comment
founding

Not since their initial replies. I don't want to pester because I know how much work it takes to do what they're doing. I think mentioning it in the comments as a reminder is a good idea. It's only going to have impact when somebody argues it in court (and ideally a judge somewhere agrees). So mostly I'd like to know how it would be countered, to have an idea of what it's up against.

Expand full comment

I hardly see them in the comments though. Hopefully we'll see them today.

Expand full comment
founding

The lack of pushback is breathtaking. The silence is heartbreaking. It’s as if it’s already a fait accompli that women are doomed.

Expand full comment

I know, it feels hopeless sometimes and it hurts. Two hopeful stories: 1. In Georgia there’s a lovely grassroots group called Regulate Guns Not Women. They wave signs outside the governors mansion for an hour every week, rain or shine, and SO MANY cars and trucks give approving honks and thumbs-up. 2. I’ve been ordering pregnancy test strips in bulk (super cheap) and leaving them in a public womens restroom with info cards (why test early, numbers for contraception & abortion clinics, etc). People will take the tests & info - and sometimes people will leave other things, like menstrual supplies and Plan B packs!

I think people do care, but many are just busy & overwhelmed and don’t think they have the power to make things better. But as long as I see these little acts of resistance and solidarity, I feel hope.

Expand full comment

What you doing is wonderful advocacy. It only takes one person to create a movement. I leave Plan C stickers in bathrooms. I like the idea of pregnancy strips. That is great!!!

Expand full comment
founding

That is a very good idea. It needs to become a national trend. We know that the women who are already most disadvantaged are having the most trouble accessing care, and often at least part of the hurdle is just knowing where to go, who to call, who can help.

Expand full comment

Unfortunately there's not much people can do until election season

Expand full comment

It is frustrating. Back when most people still thought abortion rights were secure, I attended rallies, helped organize marches, and marched for abortion rights in DC. But over the years, I think the constant threat of public mass shootings has put a damper on demonstrations, marches, and protests of all kinds. And this implicit threat has effectively put a damper on the public's right to peacefully assemble. It is entirely by design.

Expand full comment
founding

I hadn't thought of it that way but yes that's a very very good point. It's one of the big reasons they defend their guns so much.

Expand full comment
founding

The thing is if our side's two strategies are 1) trying to win elections in a system biased towards them (Democrats probably have to win nationally by 7-8 points to have a shot at the trifecta in 2025, and perhaps not that much less in subsequent elections) and 2) trying to convince a judiciary that's biased towards them, then I don't think we're using all of our resources and all of our power. At the very very least there ought to be boycotts and other economic forms of protest.

Expand full comment

Boycott what though? Seems like the Church pews are already emptying at a rapid clip but don't know what else people could boycott.

Expand full comment
founding

Decide which businesses and corporations are helping our side, and which ones are not. Walgreens was one example of the latter. Doesn't have to be completely "fair". The point is to have an impact on the money men. Strikes, walkouts, etc. are other options, but need to be coordinated so we don't leave people hanging. Lots of other civil disobedience possibilities. Idk I just think we should be throwing everything at it. They would. (And arguably did and that's why we're here.)

Expand full comment

The Comstock Act was the first thing I thought of when this all started, and I knew it was only a matter of time.

Expand full comment

Terrible that the anti choice people want to force their puritan ways down everyone's throats.

Expand full comment
founding

My god this is so bleak. So much misery and suffering, just to force people to give birth.

Expand full comment