The most infuriating thing about the national conversation on domestic work, childcare and the pandemic is that it only seems to be women who are having it.
After all, the primary reason American women are disproportionately suffering—losing jobs and cutting back hours while juggling work, childcare, and elder care—is because they have male partners who won’t do their fair share at home. We’re in the middle of what might be the biggest economic disaster for women in decades, and the men who caused it are silent.
How do we make them care? One seemingly-straightforward solution that’s been bandying about the internet is divorce: If you’re in an unequal marriage, leave.
I’ll admit, I love the simplicity. But writer Emily Gould made an important point on Twitter: Isn’t that an individual solution to a systemic problem? Wouldn’t it be better to focus on issues like paid parental leave and subsidized child care?
It’s true; telling women to leave their less-than-helpful husbands doesn’t address the structural hurdles families face. The problem, though, is that no legislation will make men want to do work they think is beneath them.
Research shows that men’s views on women, childcare and domestic work are actually more regressive now than they were decades ago: While most American men support equality in other areas of women’s lives, nearly half still want a housewife. Even ‘progressive’ men don’t often live their politics at home. Policy alone can’t change that kind of widespread thinking.
In fact, family-friendly policies can even have the unintended consequence of reinforcing traditional gender roles.
One study, for example, showed that male professors given paternity leave used the time to publish more papers instead of watching their children. As a result, their careers progressed faster than those of their female peers who used parental leave to...parent. Or consider that in Nordic countries—whose policies are pointed to as the gold standard—men aren’t nearly as likely as women to make use of paid parental leave, which often re-entrenches sexism at home.
This doesn’t mean we don’t fight for legislation—just that America needs a cultural shift that changes men’s hearts and minds alongside that policy progress.
Take media coverage on women and the pandemic. Nearly every headline is some version of “Covid forces women out of the workforce,” rather than the much more simple and truthful "men’s refusal to equally parent rolls back women’s progress.”
Imagine if instead of quotes from harried moms, we saw profiles of men trying to explain why their time and work is more valuable than their wives’. What if there were magazine covers framing this as a national scandal: Men across the country do nothing as the women they love lose jobs.
We could start even earlier. High school health classes shouldn’t just be covering sex education, but how ingrained ideas about gender can prevent healthy relationships. Young men could learn early on that child care and housework is as much their responsibility as women’s—and how excuses to the contrary are rooted in sexism. Young women could be taught to expect an equal relationship, and how to identify signs that their future partner may not be looking for the same.
And divorce? Instead of “just leave him”—which feels like yet another way to make men’s issues women’s problem—we could ensure that men get truthful messages about marriage.
Right now, American culture paints marriage as something women are desperate for and men desperate to avoid. But studies show that women are more likely to initiate divorces than men, that women tend to be happier than men post-divorce, and that marriage benefits men more than it does women.
If men truly understood that their happiness is much more dependent on marriage than it is for women, perhaps they’d work harder to make sure their wives weren’t miserable. (Imagine sitcoms depicting wives leaving lazy husbands, or reality shows portraying single women as reluctant to give up their freedom.)
All that said, of course women should leave husbands who aren’t good partners. I’m all for it. But while you’re signing those separation papers, let’s work towards a culture that shows men they have as much of a stake in this issue as we do.
I know it sounds awful but if my husband hadn't died, I'd probably have divorced him by now. I actually planned on leaving him within five years just before he got sick. Then I thought, fine, I'll devote my life to caregiving till he's better, then I'll leave him because then my career will REALLY be in a total shambles. As it was, he was the best guy I ever loved, but no matter what I said, no matter how I tried to explain it to him, he always managed to prioritize his work over mine. To the point where I was absolutely sure that when I quit my lucrative day job and put my writing and cartooning on hold while I took care of him, I realized that it would never have occurred to him, as a man, to do the same. Him, not work? Unimaginable. As a man, his entire identity resided in his work. (We were both cartoonists at the same magazine, only he didn't need a day job, having been a staff cartoonist for 30 years, and had just begun taking his social security checks as well). We could not make things equal for us, and, sparing all the indignities of our efforts, I knew I couldn't keep it up forever and that he didn't even have the means to support me if I lost it all after the caregiving.
A woman has to survive somehow! It was such a pity that for all he gave me, he really lacked an ability to understand how unequal our relationship had become over the years.
If he'd lived and I were still with him today, I really think I'd be in deep, deep trouble. As it was, taking care of him meant declaring bankruptcy, becoming homeless after he died, as if being bereaved and traumatized weren't enough. I have been scratching back to my career for the last four years.
So, yeah, I would have totally gotten a divorce. An amicable one, hopefully. But definitely. Basta. Plus, I really hated living together: my dream had always been to live next door to each other in separate apartments/houses. We just couldn't afford it. Maybe we all aspire to conventional marriages we don't actually want or need?
I divorced way before the pandemic. And I’ll admit that it took being a single parent to appreciate all my ex wife did with the kids and home. Now, half the time I have to juggle the kids and all that comes with it, and before covid work. I quit my job in March to guide the kids through their virtual schooling while they were with me. A lot of my friends wonder why I didn’t just drop them off at their moms house before work and keep working. The reason, it’s not her job. It’s my job. Being a single dad has realigned my work life balance in a way that it wasn’t before. And for all the structural deficiencies we have that tell men that the kids aren’t their responsibility at home, we have just as many telling men that their job is to make as much money as possible to provide for the family. I thought I was doing my part before my divorce. It took me getting divorced to understand the stress she was under. I only wish my ex wife would have experienced the stress of providing for a family on her own for a while to appreciate my perspective.