A Florida school is under fire this week for altering at least 80 female students’ yearbook photos to appear more ‘modest’. Hints of cleavage were blurred or erased, and shirts were poorly-photoshopped to cover more skin. A Bartram Trail High School representative told The New York Times that the girls’ pictures would have normally been omitted from the yearbook altogether for violating their dress code, and the alterations were “a solution to make sure all students were included.” How magnanimous!
Tellingly, a picture of the boys swim team in Speedos went untouched.
Outdated and sexist dress codes are the norm in most schools across the country. The regulations range from rules about skirt lengths and bare midriffs to outright bans on leggings and showing shoulders. While schools do have dress code rules for boys—generally regarding vulgar t-shirt slogans—it’s almost exclusively female students who are targeted by administrators. They’re pulled out of class or stopped in the hall, humiliated and made to change into baggy shirts and sweats.
These girls are told that their clothes are a “distraction” from learning, as if their male peers are incapable of absorbing algebra while in the presence of bare legs. (There is no equivalent concern, of course, that pulling girls out of class might be a distraction to their education.)
In addition to sending the very dangerous message that girls are responsible for boys’ desire and behavior, dress code proponents suggest these rules aren’t just about boys’ distractibility—but girls’ safety. That by banning ‘suggestive’ clothing, schools can curb bullying and sexual harassment.
The only thing worse than telling girls to cover up in order to be respected, is telling them to cover up in order to be protected.
Girls and women are harassed and assaulted in everything from skirts and heels to sweatpants and sneakers. They are raped in army fatigues and school uniforms, pajamas, and even—I’m horrified to say—diapers. There is nothing a person can wear that will provoke sexual violence.
The truth is that clothes don’t sexualize or endanger girls, adults do. If a school official looks at a teenager in a tank top and sees something sexual, the problem is not the student.
In Virginia, for example, a teenager was kicked out of her prom because her classmates’ fathers complained she was inspiring “impure thoughts.” Why should girls be punished for adult men’s fucked up brains?
The issue isn't just why girls are disciplined, but how. At a school in North Dakota, for example, administrators banned girls from wearing leggings and had them watch clips from Pretty Woman to prove that only sex workers wore tight pants. And in Florida, a high school dean made a teenager “move around” to gauge how inappropriate her breasts looked. The girl, who wasn’t wearing a bra because she was recovering from a severe sunburn, was then forced to put bandaids over her nipples.
All of this is far more sexualizing than a bare shoulder in science class.
It’s not a coincidence that the students most likely to be dress coded are those with curvier bodies—a shirt that adults deem ‘appropriate’ on one girl will be banned on another. Dress codes also disproportionately target and punish Black girls, who are more likely to be hyper-sexualized. And that’s the rub: It’s never really been the clothes that schools are taking issue with, but the bodies they deem dangerous.
With every detention given, every sweatshirt forced onto a student, schools are teaching girls that there is something bad and shameful about their natural development. Even worse, these children are learning that the adults meant to care for them look at their bodies and see sex. Imagine being 13 years-old and putting on leggings because they’re comfortable, only to find out a teacher sees something very different.
That’s why dress codes aren’t just sexist; they’re sexual harassment. What else would you call adults systematically singling out girls, publicly shaming them, and interrupting their education?
Let girls live in their bodies. Let them go to class, play sports, eat lunch, hang out with their friends and experiment with fashion. And if you’re worried that someone will get the wrong idea by their outfit—change the world, not their shirt.
If you like & value this newsletter, please consider moving to the paid version. You’ll have access to all my pieces and be able to comment on columns and in open threads. (“One Good Thing,” where folks share something positive that happened to them that week—from getting a promotion or seeing a friend to growing a tomato for the first time—is a real highlight. It’s an incredible serotonin boost & really lovely!)
The questions for me is --- isn't female fashion geared towards the male gaze?
I am bi and when I see an attractive woman wearing tights that show her labia I do get turned on.
Low cut clothing is mainly produced for women (and now children).
You don't see men walking around showing off skin to attract women. Or lesbian women showing of their cleavage and midriffs.
Gay guys are known to dress in more attention grabbing and tight clothing primarily to appeal to the male gaze. Choice feminism, even when considering clothing, refuses to acknowledge that choices are caused by the surrounding environments.
Why do girls want to show off their breasts/legs etc?
Why is fashion, even for toddlers, geared towards the male gaze?
In reference to the boys in speedos, I am sure the female swim team would have been able to wear their suits in their photos. I am also sure that boys were not showing off the shape of their sex organs in the photos.
We need to respect our bodies and dress appropriately for the occasion. The urge to be sexually appealing in dressing is the result of patriarchal colonization of the mind and ideas of self worth.
Else we are always going to be stuck between fashion being geared towards the male gaze and then males complaining about us being sexually attractive in non romantic contexts.
Look at female leaders/scientists - they don't dress to appeal to males
Waaay back in the 1970's, in my very religious and conservative small Southern town, our schools had no air conditioning. In sweltering August and May, all the girls wore the short shorts and spaghetti strap tops or sundresses that were fashionable at the time. The boys were often wearing short athletic shorts and tank tops (it WAS the 70's) because we were all wilting in the heat. Nobody suggested that our clothes gave the boys any excuse for being distracted or for misbehaving. The adults didn't sexualize our attire and so we didn't. I honestly can't remember it being an issue. Flash forward to the early 2000's when my daughter was in middle school. It was a miserable struggle trying to find fashionable girls clothing that passed her school's dress code because they couldn't show even a sliver of midriff with their arms raised. I remember thinking that the school administration seemed to be pushing the kids to think of themselves in a sexual way rather than reacting to any behavior by the kids. I felt they were pushing their adult interpretations onto my child's body and destroying her innocence.