Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ruth ND's avatar

I just wrote a whole thing that was so riddled with profanity that it was essentially incoherent. So, I’m starting over... I suspect this is their response to our side focusing on storytelling. But we aren’t getting the full story from them - just a name dropping of an experience that is actually a huge spectrum. I’ve had a late miscarriage that required an abortion to prevent sepsis. I’ve also had an early miscarriage that happened without any kind of medical intervention in the privacy of my own home. My first (late) miscarriage was the scariest and most traumatic moment in my life so far. My early miscarriage was easily managed at home, even while it was emotionally gutting. I don’t know what their wives went through, but using them as shields is not only deeply effed up, but it doesn’t guarantee that they (or their wives) necessarily experienced the life-threatening nature of these bans. Having a wife who went through a miscarriage doesn’t necessarily make you any more aware of what pregnancy is, how complicated it can be for other people, or how devastating and life-threatening these bans are. I think we fight this “storytelling” by continuing with our own - by highlighting women who have actually been through it with these bans. With details. With nuance. And you’re right, Jessica - this is just like the “I have a wife” “I have a daughter” bullshit. I am so angry and so tired. It’s because of these men that I feel panicked about what a high risk pregnancy could look like even in blue states after 2024. So, no, Ron and Vivek - you have no fucking idea what it’s like to miscarry in post-Roe America.

Expand full comment
Terry Moon's avatar

I only hope that some reporter will ask them the question you posed: "...how they would feel if their wives were treated this way." The way they are forcing women to be treated.

Expand full comment
57 more comments...

No posts