Sasha Ahuja is the Campaign Director for New Yorkers for Equal Rights.
Everyone deserves the freedom to control our own lives, futures, and healthcare decisions, including our right to abortion. In New York, we’re trying to finally make that a reality permanently.
Two years since the overturn of Roe v Wade, and we’re living in a world few wanted: half the states in the country have abortion bans, overlapping with those where even birth control and IVF are in jeopardy. People living in states where abortion and broader reproductive rights have been rescinded have lost the fundamental right to control their own bodies, lives, and futures—with no telling if or how they’ll get it back. People elsewhere—like in New York where I live, work and am raising my daughter—are looking on in horror and doing their best to fight on their behalf.
When Dobbs was decided, New York became known as a safe haven for reproductive healthcare; people assume that there is no risk to abortion rights here. But that’s a dangerous assumption that overlooks the very real threats to and vulnerabilities of reproductive healthcare rights in New York. The truth is that none of our rights are as safe, regardless of where we live.
Despite New York’s progressive reputation on reproductive rights, the state only passed true reproductive health protections just a few years ago, in 2019. That’s because the 2018 election put lawmakers who support abortion rights in control of both houses of the State Legislature for the first time in a decade. Prior attempts to pass similar legislation were blocked by anti-abortion legislators who held the majority in the state senate.
Like any state law, New York’s laws—including abortion rights—can be repealed or changed through a vote in the State Legislature and a sign-off from the Governor.
This scenario is hardly far-fetched. Again, pro-abortion legislators didn’t control the State Legislature until quite recently. In the last decade alone, New York legislators introduced 53 anti-abortion and anti-reproductive rights bills. And in the 2022 election, New York saw the largest shift to the right of any state in the nation—and a staunchly anti-abortion candidate came within five points of winning the Governor’s Mansion. If elected, he had promised to appoint an anti-abortion extremist as the state health minister.
This is all to say that the political winds can and do shift—even in a state like New York. And laws shift along with them. A constitutional amendment, on the other hand, cements our rights permanently.
In November, New Yorkers will vote on Proposal 1, which would add the New York Equal Rights Amendment to our state Constitution. Prop 1 closes loopholes in the New York constitution so that people in this state—regardless of gender, age, ethnicity, pregnancy status, disability status, or whether someone is LGBT—can never be discriminated against by the government.
Crucially, the amendment would prohibit discrimination based on pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes, and reproductive healthcare and autonomy—blocking any government action to curtail a person’s access to reproductive healthcare, including abortion. In other words, Prop 1 will permanently guarantee abortion and other reproductive healthcare access in New York—regardless of what politicians try to do down the line.
And here’s what makes Prop 1 different: While other states have equal rights amendments that cover a person’s sex, they don’t include the explicit reproductive healthcare- and pregnancy-related provisions that Prop 1 does. It’s a powerful framework for cementing fundamental freedoms and guaranteeing reproductive healthcare rights in a post-Roe world.
But again, New York isn’t immune to the power of the anti-abortion movement, and as has happened in every state considering a pro-choice amendment, anti-abortion activists and lawmakers here have launched a well-organized, sustained effort to kill Prop 1. They know voters support abortion rights, so they want to keep New Yorkers from having the chance to vote on the issue.
In late 2023, anti-abortion Assembly member Marjorie Brynes filed a lawsuit to remove Prop 1 from the ballot, baselessly claiming that we hadn’t followed the procedure for passing the amendment through the State Legislature. A lower court accepted that claim and kicked Prop 1 off the ballot. Thankfully, the amendment was restored to November’s ballot by the New York Appellate Division, but the attacks didn’t end there. Anti-abortion operatives have repeatedly tried to appeal to New York’s highest court. And while these attempts have been denied, this legal challenge is just one of many.
While anti-abortion politicians try to stop New Yorkers from voting on Prop 1, anti-abortion groups have waged an aggressive war in the press, planting misinformation and lies about what the amendment would do. They’re doing everything they can to scare people into believing that Prop 1 is in service of some kind of radical agenda, rather than the truth: the amendment is a permanent safeguard for abortion and other rights that New Yorkers are overwhelmingly in favor of.
Anti-abortion groups and lawmakers also want New Yorkers to believe that Prop 1 isn’t necessary to protect reproductive rights, saying abortion is already legal in the state. But if abortion rights were entirely safe, why would there be such a concerted effort to undermine an amendment that would simply affirm that in the State Constitution? And why would that effort be almost entirely funded by anti-abortion activists? It’s because unlike most New Yorkers, Prop 1’s opponents don’t see these rights as a given—they see protections for our bodies and freedom as up for grabs. And they know that passing Prop 1 will definitively close the door on their future attempts to restrict and ban abortion.
The last two years have shown that we should never take our fundamental freedoms for granted. We’ve watched as legislators in state after state have banned abortion against voters wishes: like in Iowa, where the overwhelming majority of voters are pro-abortion, yet extremist legislators used Dobbs to strip Iowans of their reproductive rights. Or in Florida, where anti-abortion lawmakers enacted a 6-week abortion ban even though a majority of voters support abortion rights.
The anti-abortion movement will stop at nothing to roll back our rights, no matter where we live. And while New Yorkers may feel insulated from the national battle over abortion rights, we can’t rely on the status quo, elected officials, or the courts to protect us.
New Yorkers support abortion. But as we’ve seen elsewhere, voter support for reproductive rights doesn’t always translate into being allowed to keep them—not without constitutional protections. Prop 1 puts the power to safeguard our most fundamental freedoms in voters’ hands. New Yorkers now have the opportunity to proactively stand up for and secure our reproductive rights. It’s imperative that we not let it go to waste.
Visit nyequalrights.org to chip in what you can or volunteer to pass Proposal 1 so we can protect our most fundamental rights – including the right to an abortion – this fall.
You are a mother? And you model the behavior of advocating for abortion on demand for your daughter? Let me rephrase that—you advocate for other women to have such a low regard for innocent and defenseless human beings—their own children in fact—that you will take to the streets to show your support for babies being forcibly birthed, then executed and you are so insidiously vicious and shallow you will self righteously portray the brutal execution of babies that can live without their mother’s support as a “Right”. It simply means you are so dim and full of yourself that you think you have the “right” to murder innocent and defenseless people. That is worse than Eichmann and he was a complete imbecile. Apparently you don’t grasp the implications of Evolutionary Theory. An inclination towards filicide is THE WORST signal of evolutionary fitness in a mate—wait—-it might be overshadowed by a few catastrophic genetic disorders that produce severe deformity or morbid obesity or mental illnesses like schizophrenia or coprophilia but you are a mother and you don’t see the problem with *promoting* as a “societal good” other women having their offspring dismembered in their bellies? Could it be more obvious why men are avoiding women? Coprophilia is LESS repulsive than the mental illness reflected by abortionism. THERE ARE TWELVE FORMS OF BIRTH CONTROL, EXCEPT FOR CASES OF SA, IF YOU GET PREGNANT IT IS BECAUSE YOU WERE NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH OR COMPASSIONATE ENOUGH TO BE BOTHERED TO TAKE THE SIMPLE STEPS NECESSARY TO NOT GET PREGNANT. Do you not perceive that the nature of what you are “fighting for” is *obvious* to anyone observing your behavior? You can already control when you get pregnant or not so you don’t need to advocate for the absolute atrocity of late term abortions on a whim. It is hard to explain how repugnant and tragic it is to see a ‘mother’ so deeply beset by psychosis that she does not see the horrors of what she is proposing. WAKE UP, the only difference between post-birth filicide and PRE birth filicide is that it is well known that *murdering born babies is murder* and is only perpetrated by people so mentally ill or criminal or both that they don’t have the capacity to NOT MURDER BABIES— PRE birth filicide is more insane and brutal than conventional murder by an order of magnitude because YOU ARE EMPLOYING THIRD PARTIES TO PERPETRATE AN ACT OF ATROCITY AGAINST YOUR OWN CHILD IN YOUR OWN BELLY—AT LEAST SERIAL KILLERS KILL STRANGERS— AND THE ASSASSINS YOU EMPLOY WILL PROFIT. 🤷🏾 I am not religious in the slightest, I don’t believe in supernatural creatures, I believe that every human life is precious no matter what color or sexual preference, or level of ability or disability a person has— everyone has the right to be alive and be free. But if you hate yourself and your family and your species and the world so much it is better you don’t have offspring— ultimately your insipid brutality will go extinct and we will be left with kind and loving mothers. Abortion is an Engine of atrocity.
And we have a similar--and popular--ballot provision here in Colorado.